Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

A NEW WAVE OF THE WOMEN’S MOVEMENT

Sarah Palin got a near perfect score for her Olympian dive off the heights of the Republican convention and onto the national stage as John McCain’s vice-presidential running mate. Her performance since then and the positive reaction to it by conservative women sent a hurricane-sized wave at the women’s movement. For those of us still paddling toward the promise of second-wave feminism (post Betty Friedan’s “The Feminine Mystique”) the water has gotten suddenly rough.

Conservative female voters who came to a Palin rally in Virginia had finally found a brand of feminism, although they would be loathe to call it that, that they could embrace. Palin is with them on social issues like opposing the right to choose an abortion or providing sex education other than promoting abstinence. She wants to put creationism into school curriculums and keep gays from marrying. But she also stands for being a working mother and wife. She’s a woman with five children whose life stands for the idea that mothers can be successful in the working world, even more successful than men. She’s all about “shattering the glass ceiling,” as she put it, breast pump in one hand and hammer in the other.  As Republican pollster and mother of three Kellyanne Conway put it, “(Palin) strongly conveys to women today that you don’t have to choose between a successful career and motherhood. You do have to make sacrifices, but you can have it all.”

Evidently, while us second-wave feminists were focused on extending and enforcing legislative victories for equal gender treatment in the workplace and in schools, the powerful idea that women deserve equal rights began to seep into conservative thinking –maybe men could take on more home responsibility, maybe it is unfairly limiting and destructive to assign women roles that constrict their ambition, creativity and dreams.

The hypocrisy of conservative leaders embracing these feminist ideas when it comes to Palin, from jabberers like O’Reilly and Limbaugh to movement leaders like Phyllis Schlafly of the Eagle Forum and James Dobson of Focus on the Family is thick as sewer sludge, but it’s also a distraction.  Those Americans who care about ensuring and expanding the promise of equality for women need to think about how Palin can forward the feminist agenda. We also have to be wary of a Palinesque pseudo-feminism full of inherent contradictions.

The McCain/Palin ticket opposes pay equity for women, but extols the virtues of Palin’s husband Todd helping out at home, a circumstance unaffordable for most couples.  With women’s wages still lagging behind those of men, the dream of shared parental responsibility is just that.  When it comes to pregnancy, women who make the difficult and deeply personal decision to have an abortion aren’t looking to be told they can have it all, they just want to be left alone. And while conservative women rejoice that Palin rejects the promise of science in stem cell research and the importance of scientific discovery represented by the teaching of evolution, they also see her opening the door to their aspirations. But Palin’s stubborn adherence to discredited ideas offers little hope that she will attack the kind of continuing sexism in the workplace that limits women’s pay and opportunities. A  woman who can’t agree that equality dictates that anyone should be able to marry whomever they love isn’t likely to undertake the fight for equality that will give women full rights in every part of American life.

Still, Palin has created a new wave in the womens’ movement. But it’s a riptide certain to pull us back from gains we have made and progress we look to achieve if we don’t respond with respect and savvy.  I don’t agree on social issues with most Republican women, but I do believe they suffer from sexism as I have. They are caught  in the cultural imperative that tells them they must be everything to everyone and, therefore, leaves little time or energy for them to follow their passion and dreams. They are populating workplaces where a double standard for leadership holds them back and a double-dose of negative stereotypes about their ability to take charge, rather than just take care, leaves them frustrated and often insecure.

Sarah Palin’s given feminists the opportunity to talk about women’s equality again and get the country, and Republican women, listening. Like Democratic women, more of them than ever are in the workplace, living the experience of continued inequality. Where we stand apart on social issues, we can stand together on getting our fair share and fair chance. It’s a place, at least, to start a conversation.

VISIT MY WEBSITE: WWW.ROBINGERBER.COM

MISSING MY BLOG

Hello World! Tomorrow I turn in the manuscript for the biography of the founder of Mattel Toy company and the creator of Barbie: Ruth Handler. She has kept me away from my blog this last month, but it’s been a fun writing trip to create “Ruth and Barbie: The Story of the World’s Most Famous Doll and the Woman Who Created Her.”

Ruth has an amazing story. The tenth and last child of Polish/Jewish immigrants, she was an entreprenuerial and marketing genius. Her husband Elliot was the shy, retiring designer and she was the corporate dynamo. The company was already making millions before she came up with Barbie, and contrary to what feminists (including myself ) thought about the doll’s creation, Ruth’s idea was to give little girl’s a grown-up toy so they could fantasize about being grown-up women. Unfortunately, the model she found was a German sex toy, but you’ll have to read the book (out from Harper/Collins next year on Barbie’s fiftieth birthday) to get that story. Ruth also lost a breast to cancer and her company to a federal fraud charge, but rehabilitated herself (ala but better than Martha Stewart) by creating a line of breast prostheses that made her a hero to breast cancer survivors.

Why don’t more people know about Ruth Handler? She built a $300 million dollar company and created one of the most recognizable icons in the world, but she was a woman. No one bothered to write her biography, and the press refers to her as a “co-founder,” at best, of Mattel. I assure you, without Ruth, her husband would have been designing light fixtures or toys for Louis Marx, who was the big toy company back then.

I’m looking forward to getting back into the election news and will be writing for Politics Magazine (formerly Campaigns & Elections), Huffington Post, Women’s Voices for Change, and of course, right here. Thanks for your comments, especially about my novel “Eleanor vs. Ike” which is still timely reading!!

CLAY FEET

I’m not surprised to discover Senator Barack Obama has clay feet. I would be more surprised to discover that he was the second-coming of the political messiah that many of his supporters seem to believe. That he is hedging on his pledge to only use public funds for the general election should he be the nominee, or that he copied Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick’s prose are chinks in a wall of supposed perfection that always sat on shaky ground…READ THE REST AT HUFFINGTON POST

READ ABOUT ELEANOR ROOSEVELT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN THE NEW NOVEL “ELEANOR VS. IKE”

WHO WOULD ELEANOR ROOSEVELT ENDORSE?

Would Eleanor Roosevelt endorse Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama if she were here today? I’m asked that a lot as I travel around the country talking about my novel in which Eleanor runs against Ike in 1952. It’s a fair question. She was a champion of both women’s and civil rights…READ THE REST AT HUFFINGTON POST

READ ABOUT ELEANOR ROOSEVELT’S RUN FOR PRESIDENT IN THE NEW NOVEL: ELEANOR VS. IKE!

THE FOX FAIRNESS FANTASY

Keith Olberman needs to go on red alert. Hillary Clinton says Fox News Channel has treated her more fairly in terms of coverage than MSNBC. Could it be that the channel using the most objectified, smutty and often inane images of women during the video feed that accompanies stories is mending its ways? Is it possible that Fox will soon allow women on-air who aren’t talking blond mannequins? If so, Clinton will have cracked the mirrored ceiling in the penthouse of sexist television. Whether she wins the presidency or not, that’s quite an accomplishment…READ THE REST AT HUFFINGTON POST!

And read about Eleanor Roosevelt running for President on my website! 

HILLARY HAS FEARS TOO

I’m traveling this week, promoting Eleanor vs. Ike and speaking about Eleanor Roosevelt’s great leadership. I had the privilege of speaking to nearly one hundred women in Sacramento, California on Wednesday, February 6th, the day after Super Tuesday.

They were a wonderful audience of women in high-level jobs in state government and education, and they loved hearing about Eleanor’s exploits… READ THE REST AT WOMEN’S VOICES FOR CHANGE.

VISIT MY WEBSITE TO READ ABOUT “Eleanor vs. Ike”

FRIGID NO MORE

A very close friend told me recently that she was diagnosed with a condition new to my ears: vulvodynia. Her story makes me furious.

Turns out that for about one hundred years women have been complaining about pain in their genital region. The pain may be burning or stinging, sometimes constant, sometimes just upon pressure like during intercourse. For some women, the pain is so severe they have trouble sitting for long periods of time.

Vulvodynia is hard to diagnosis, and for a long time the medical establishment didn’t try very hard. Throughout most of the last century, if a woman complained about vaginal pain she was told she was imagining it. She was told she was crazy. She was told she was frigid and phobic…READ THE REST AT WOMEN’S VOICES FOR CHANGE

 

VISIT MY WEBSITE AND READ ABOUT MY NEW NOVEL!

2,025 Reasons to Remain Focused

There are 2,025 reasons for Sen. Hillary Clinton and her supporters to stay calm, focused and resolved going forward. That’s the number of delegates some suggest is needed to win the Democratic nomination.The other important number is 174. That’s the total delegates that will have been chosen by the time the fourth vote is taken in South Carolina on Jan. 26.

Sen. Barack Obama and Clinton each picked up nine delegates in New Hampshire. Nationally, Obama currently leads with 25 pledged delegates. Clinton is in second with 24, and John Edwards has 18. (A closer look at the full scorecard, including super delegates, is available here.)…read the rest at Women’s Voices for Change

HILLARY THE TEA BAG

Clinton-fatigue drove independents and young voters into Barack Obama’s caucus corners in Iowa last night. Hillary Clinton’s gender, as radical a change for the presidency as Obama’s race, was trumped by voter familiarity with her fifteen-year, often controversial reign as the most prominent woman politician in the country. She looked more like news from the 1990’s than the future first woman president of the United States.
Clinton’s strategy consciously invited voters to look back, not just at her early work and legislative record, but at the respected legacy of her husband’s White House years. Her campaign seemed to believe that because Clinton is a woman, the “change thing” would take care of itself. After all, anyone could look at her and see she represented change.
But voters wanted more. They wanted to feel a sense of movement, of difference. They wanted to feel the emotional exhilaration of hope for the future after seven bleak years of Bush despair. Unlike Barack Obama, Clinton tried to skip the heart part and go upfront with beating up on Bush and pounding out her policy ideas. It isn’t an awful strategy, but it also isn’t the right strategy for this moment in time.
Now the heat is turned way up for Clinton to regroup. Independent voters are even more likely to be a big percentage of the vote in New Hampshire than they were in Iowa. Obama had the message in Iowa that hit them in the right place, right now. Clinton has an even more compelling narrative around change and hope, because she will know how to deliver. Fashioning that message, however, and delivering it with strength and purpose will be hard because Obama’s rhetoric is out in front. That’s why it’s a good time for Clinton to think about one of her favorite Eleanor Roosevelt quotes: “A woman is like a teabag. She doesn’t know how strong she is until she gets in hot water.” Facing the voters of New Hampshire, Clinton’s about to find out how strong she really is.